Legal Opinion

State v. Moorman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1987No. 577PA86PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

Questions presented dispositive of the appeal are whether the Court of Appeals erred in (1) arresting judgment on defendant’s conviction of second degree rape and (2) concluding defendant was not denied his right to effective assistance of counsel at trial. We answer both questions affirmatively, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and award defendant a new trial in all cases.

I

Defendant was tried on indictments charging first degree burglary, second degree rape, and second degree sexual offense at the 11 February 1985 Session of Superior Court in Wake County…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Eddie G. Javor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. People v. CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Rita M. Martin v. Betty Kassulke, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. MorganherringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API