State v. Moorman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
Questions presented dispositive of the appeal are whether the Court of Appeals erred in (1) arresting judgment on defendant’s conviction of second degree rape and (2) concluding defendant was not denied his right to effective assistance of counsel at trial. We answer both questions affirmatively, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and award defendant a new trial in all cases.
I
Defendant was tried on indictments charging first degree burglary, second degree rape, and second degree sexual offense at the 11 February 1985 Session of Superior Court in Wake County…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Eddie G. Javor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- People v. CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Rita M. Martin v. Betty Kassulke, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- State v. MorganherringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.