Legal Opinion
State Farm General Insurance v. JT's Frames, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 2010No. B215457PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
—In an Illinois lawsuit, appellant JT’s Frames, Inc. (JT’s), obtained a settlement on behalf of itself and a class of similarly situated entities based on defendant’s transmission of over 74,000 unsolicited faxes to class members. In the underlying lawsuit, respondent State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm) sought a declaration that JT’s claims were not covered as “advertising injury” or “property damage” under policies State Farm allegedly issued to the Illinois defendant. JT’s moved to quash service of State Farm’s complaint on the ground JT’s was not subject to…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2021
- Air MacHine Com SRL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- ViaView, Inc. v. RetzlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.