Legal Opinion
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 1, 2016No. 15-2080PublishedCited by 418 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
In this insurance coverage dispute, Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) seeks a declaration that it has no obligation to defend or indemnify its insured, Stevens & Ricci, Inc. (“Stevens & Ricci”), in connection with a $2,000,000 judgment entered against Stevens & Ricci *392as part of the settlement of a class action lawsuit. In that class action, the Hymed Group Corporation (“Hymed”) alleged, as representative of the class) that Stevens & Ricci had violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 .U.S.C. § 227, by sending unsolicited…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by418 opinions
- Anthony Allen v. Lawrence DeBelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Mall Chevrolet Inc v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Ecore Int'l, Inc. v. DowneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Priya Verma v. 3001 Castor IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Troy Moore, Sr. v. Saajida WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
413 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.