Legal Opinion
ViaView, Inc. v. Retzlaff
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 6, 2016No. H041521PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
—Plaintiff and respondent ViaView, Inc. (hereafter ViaView), filed a petition for a workplace violence restraining order (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.8) 1 against defendant and appellant Thomas Retzlaff. Retzlaff, a resident of Texas, filed a motion to quash the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction. He also filed other motions, either concurrently with or after he filed the motion to quash. The trial court concluded that Retzlaff had made a general appearance since he had participated in the litigation beyond filing the motion to quash. On that basis, it denied the motion…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Strasner v. Touchstone Wireless Repair & Logistics, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Buskirk v. BuskirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Buskirk v. BuskirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Franklin v. City of KingsburgDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Genentech, Inc. v. Arendal Mgmt., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.