Legal Opinion

Ramstead v. Morgan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1959PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action of libel. Plaintiff is an attorney duly licensed to practice law in this state. The alleged libelous statements were contained in a letter written to the chairman of the Lane county grievance committee of the Oregon State Bar. The letter is set out below. The defendant answered, pleading truth, privilege and mitigation. After plaintiff had begun to testify defendant interposed an objection on the ground that the letter did not contain defamatory matter and on the further ground that if it did the statements made in the letter were privileged under ORS 9.550. The trial court…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Reagan v. Guardian Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hecht v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 1993

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API