Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McCloud v. Seier

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 15, 1978No. 60010PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

This original proceeding in prohibition presents the question of whether plaintiff’s treating physician may, at defendant’s behest, be named in a personal injury action to examine plaintiff who, over his objection, must submit to such examination pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 60.

In the underlying damage action, defendant moved that plaintiff be ordered examined for defendant’s purposes by Dr. Michael P. Casini, one of plaintiff’s personal treating physicians for the injuries at bar. Plaintiff, who had furnished defendant the medical and hospital records pertaining to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Fullerton v. FordyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Richardson v. WendelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Moore v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. State ex rel. American Manufacturing Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Brandt v. PelicanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Brandt v. Medical Defense AssociatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Woytus v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API