Legal Opinion

Timpte v. District Court in and for City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 27, 1966No. 22434PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

In two separate complaints the plaintiffs each claimed damages for personal injuries arising out of separate automobile accidents. The defendants each filed motions in their respective cases under R.C.P. Colo. 35 requesting physical examinations of the plaintiffs, since the physical condition of the plaintiffs was in issue. In each case, the trial judge stated that he would not require the plaintiffs to submit to physical examinations by doctors s sleeted by the defendants, since the plaintiffs had each objected to the defendants’ selections. The trial court then went on to say that it would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gale v. National Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  2. Krook v. BlombergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  3. Davis v. S. Klein on the Square, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Fairchild v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Mercury Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Looney v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  5. Liechty v. Terrill Trucking Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API