Denison v. Goforth
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Plaintiff brings this action for alleged medical malpractice but levels her main contentions at our interpretation of the statute of limitations in Lindquist v. Mullen, 45 Wn.2d 675, 277 P.2d 724 (1954). In a situation where a surgical sponge had been inadvertently enclosed in the surgical wound, we said in that case that the cause of action accrued at the time of the surgical operation. After the instant appeal had been argued, this court reinterpreted the language of RCW 4.16.010 and RCW 4.16.080(2), overruled Lindquist in Ruth v. Dight, ante p. 660, 453 P.2d 631 (1969), and held that,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Wilkinson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bernal v. American Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Janisch v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Kundahl v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Duffy v. King Chiropractic ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Teeter v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.