Layton v. Allen
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
The appeal in this medical malpractice case presents the question of whether the Statute of Limitations commenced to run when the wrongful act or omission was committed by the practitioner or when the harm first manifested itself to the patient.
This is a case of first impression in this Court.
I
For present purposes, these facts are accepted :
In 1958, the plaintiff 1 underwent an abdominal operation for the correction of hernia. The defendant surgeon, in performing the operation with the assistance of employees of the co-defendant hospital, left a metallic hemostat, several…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- United States v. Wilroy ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.