Legal Opinion
Janisch v. Mullins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 1, 1969No. 10-39954-1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVIEW GRANTED BY SUPREME COURT.
Horowitz, A.C.J.
Plaintiff filed a complaint on June 13, 1967, against defendant physician alleging that defendant was negligent in diagnosing plaintiff’s condition by an erroneous reading of an X ray of the plaintiff and that as a result, plaintiff lost his sight. The complaint, after alleging that the negligent X ray reading occurred on or about February 25, 1958, further alleged that the defendant
fraudulently . . . concealed from the plaintiff his radiological findings and his . . . negligent . . . diagnosis . . . and plaintiff’s right to demand reparation .…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Wilkinson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Lipsey v. Michael Reese HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- Peters v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.