Legal Opinion

Teeter v. Lawson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 12, 1980No. 3813-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Dr. Lawson appeals the trial court's dismissal of his statute of limitation defense. The issue is whether the 1971 medical malpractice statute of limitation, RCW 4.16.350, abrogated the "discovery rule" as it was announced by the Supreme Court in Ruth v. Dight, 75 Wn.2d 660, 453 P.2d 631 (1969). We agree with the trial court that the legislature altered the common-law "discovery rule," and affirm the judgment. The 1971 statute contained the discovery rule, but not the reasonable diligence requirement.

The action arose out of minor surgery performed by Dr. Lawson in March of 1972 to remove…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Knowles v. HollyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lindquist v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gunnier v. Yakima Heart Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gunnier v. Yakima Heart Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API