United State of Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to annul an order appointing a special administrator. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
WORKS, J., pro tem.
On September 14, 1917, upon petition regularly filed, the respondent made an order appointing Ingina Ostergard special administratrix of the estate of Bjelka Paulsen, deceased; but at the hearing on the petition no evidence was received of the death of Bjelka Paulsen. This proceeding is instituted for an annulment of the order because of the lack of the evidence mentioned. An administrator of the estate of a person manifestly cannot be appointed until such person is deceased, and the only manner ' in which death can be shown to the court which is asked to appoint is by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Fleming v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Linsteadt v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Marculescu v. City Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- United State Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.