United State Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in Certiorari originally instituted in the District Court of Appeal to annul an order appointing a special administratrix of the estate of a deceased person. S. M. Marsh, Judge. Order affirmed. v The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Patterson Sprigg and Thomas, Beedy & Lanagan, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
A writ of certiorari was issued by the district court of appeal for the second appellate district to review an order of the superior court of San Diego County appointing Ingina Ostergard special administratrix of the estate of Bjelka Paulsen, deceased. A return was made, and the reviewing court gave judgment annulling the order of appointment upon the ground that the superior court had acted without any competent evidence of the jurisdictional fact of the death of the alleged decedent. A prior order appointing said Ingina Ostergard special administratrix of the estate had theretofore been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. RatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. MayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Estate of HeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Howard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.