Goodin v. Vendley
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JURISDICTION
In federal court, subject matter jurisdiction may arise from either "federal question jurisdiction" or "diversity of citizenship" when the amount in controversy exceeds $ 75,000. See Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams , 482 U.S. 386, 392, 107 S.Ct. 2425, 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987). To properly allege diversity jurisdiction, a plaintiff must claim damages in excess of $ 75,000 and each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ; Diaz v. Davis (In re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litig.) , 549 F.3d 1223, 1234 (9th Cir. 2008). Here, as all parties…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tesla, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- High Sierra Holistics, LLC v. State of Nevada, Department of TaxationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Jolly v. Intuit IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Myers v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Ozcan Tankoba v. Café Figaro, Inc, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.