Legal Opinion
Myers v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 21, 2025No. 3:24-cv-02668Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMELIA MYERS, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02668-AMO Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR STAY 10 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC, et al., PROCEEDINGS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 27 12 13 This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Amelia Myers and Fatoumata Barry 14 Yapo against their former employers, Defendants Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Kite Pharma, Inc. 15 Myers and Yapo allege that Gilead and Kite Pharma utilized the wrong rate of pay to calculate 16 overtime…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.