Legal Opinion

In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litigation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 2008No. 06-35838PublishedCited by 286 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

549 F.3d 1223 (2008)

In re DIGIMARC CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION.

George Diaz, derivatively on behalf of Digimarc Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Bruce Davis; E.K. Ranjit; Phillip J. Monego; Peter W. Smith; Alty Van Luijt; Brian J. Grossi; Jim Roth; James T. Richardson; John Taysom; William A. Krepick; Geoffrey Rhoads; and Digimarc Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-35838.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted August 26, 2008.

Filed December 11, 2008.

Marc Umeda, Jeffrey Fink, and Rebecca Peterson, Robbins, Umeda & Fink, LLP, San…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by286 opinions

  1. Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Karen Logan v. Us Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Richard Doermer v. Kathryn CallenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Alvarado v. Cajun Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Beck v. DobrowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API