Legal Opinion
Ozcan Tankoba v. Café Figaro, Inc, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 14, 2026No. 3:26-cv-01527Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OZCAN TANKOBA, Case No. 26-cv-01527-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. STAY CAFÉ FIGARO, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants. Self-represented Plaintiff commenced two actions in state court against Defendants. He then brought this action in federal court before commencing two other actions in state court. All five cases arise from the Plaintiff’s employment at Café Figaro and the harassment he allegedly suffered while working there. In light of the four pending state court cases, Defendants now move to stay this action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- RR Street & Co. Inc. v. Transport Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Seneca Insurance Company, Inc. v. Strange Land, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.