Loftus v. Fischer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action in equity to reform a written contract. Judgment went for the defendant, and an appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll alone, without a bill of exceptions. The contract sought to be reformed was the result of the following state of facts: Loftus was the owner of 5,000 shares of stock of a certain mining corporation. Fischer was the owner of a much larger number of shares. Loftus desired to purchase of Fischer 6,800 shares. Fischer claimed that Loftus was already indebted to him in the sum of $5,000. The price agreed upon for the stock was $10,971.80, and no money was to be…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Hoeft v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Joyce v. RubinIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Heaton-Hobson Associated Law Offices v. ArperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.