Legal Opinion
Nick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-0762PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.
Toyota Motor Sales appeals a judgment in favor of James Nick and against Toyota. Toyota contends that the tried court erred by ruling that Toyota was required to take back the vehicle it sold to Nick and refund the purchase price. Toyota also contends that the trial court erred in its calculation of damages. Because we conclude that Wisconsin's Lemon Law required Toyota to take back the car, we affirm that part of the judgment. Because we also conclude that the damages available for Toyota's wrongful refusal to take back the car and refund the purchase price include the consumer's share of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- In Interest of PAKWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Hartlaub v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Jacobson v. American Tool Cos., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Church v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Taylor v. Volvo North America Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.