Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1996No. 93-0208PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Mr. Hughes bought a new car in 1990. It was, unfortunately, a lemon, a fact admitted by all parties. After the manufacturer failed to respond within the time limits set by law, Mr. Hughes sued the manufacturer, Chrysler, seeking among other things the amount of money he paid for the van as pecuniary damages. Under Wisconsin's "lemon law," any pecuniary damages awarded to a successful plaintiff are doubled. Chrysler argues that the purchase price of the car to the consumer is not a pecuniary damage within the meaning of the lemon law. We disagree. One purpose of the law, among others, is to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Scott Ex Rel. Ricciardi v. First State Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Eby v. KozarekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Lake City Corp. v. City of MequonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Anderson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API