Legal Opinion

In Interest of PAK

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1984No. 83-176PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The issue for review is whether, in a contested juvenile waiver hearing, the juvenile court may find prosecutive merit on the basis of the delinquency and waiver petitions alone. The state appeals a decision holding that the state must present testimony and evidence in addition to the delinquency and waiver petitions to establish prosecutive merit whenever the juvenile contests the issue of prosecutive merit. We hold that the provisions of the Children’s Code, ch. 48, Stats., do not require the state to present testimony and evidence in addition to the petitions on the issue of prosecutive…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Engineers & Scientists of Milwaukee, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mitchell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. Hoa Duc PhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API