Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Volvo North America Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1994No. 410PA92PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This case arises out of the lease of an automobile manufactured by Volvo North America Corporation (Volvo), defendant, to Curtis Taylor, plaintiff. Taylor sued Volvo under the New Motor Vehicles Warranties Act (the Act), N.C.G.S. §§ 20-351 to 20-351.10 (1993) alleging that the vehicle failed to conform to its express warranty. After hearing the evidence the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and ruled for Taylor, awarding treble damages of $8106.85 plus interest and attorney fees of $4125. The Court of Appeals affirmed and we granted defendant’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Blankenship v. Town and Country Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Southern Building Maintenance, Inc. v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Sweeney v. SMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Peterson v. Bozzano (In Re Bozzano)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API