Legal Opinion
Hartlaub v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided March 2, 1988No. 87-0668PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Henry and Marie Hartlaub brought this action against Coachmen Industries, Inc. pursuant to Wisconsin’s Lemon Law, sec. 218.015, Stats. (1983-84). A jury found Coachmen liable under the Lemon Law and Coachmen appeals. The issue turns upon the proper statutory construction of the Lemon Law. We conclude that the trial court correctly construed this statute. Therefore, we affirm the judgment.
FACTS
The Hartlaubs purchased a 1984 Coachmen Ambassador recreational vehicle (RV) from Horn’s Sales & Service, Inc., an authorized Coachmen dealer, on April 10, 1984. The Hartlaubs paid over $47,000 for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Clark Ex Rel. Nash v. Leisure Vehicles, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. City of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Hemerley v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Ronald Burzlaff v. Thoroughbred Motorsports IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Nick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Marquez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.