Legal Opinion
Feir v. Carabetta Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 26, 1978No. Civ. H-77-379, H-77-416PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
In this consolidated action, tenants of two housing projects subsidized by the federal government under section 236 of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-l, challenge the imposition of an increase in the amount they must pay for electricity costs for the use of air conditioners. The named plaintiffs, and the class they seek to represent, claim that the imposition of the increased electricity charge by the managers and owners of the apartments (the “private defendants”) and the approval of the charge by the Secretary of the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Francis M. Langevin v. Chenango Court, Inc., and Robert J. Smith, Deputy Director of the Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StanisicSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Aujero v. CDA Todco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Aujero v. Cda Todco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gramercy Spire Tenants' Ass'n v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Rogers v. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.