Legal Opinion
Aujero v. CDA Todco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1985No. 84-1576PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Dimasalang House (the House) in San Francisco, California, is a low-income housing project for the elderly, subsidized by federal funding under section 202 of the National Housing Act (NHA), 12 U.S.C. § 1701q (1982), and section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (USHA), 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (1982). Certain tenants of the House brought this action in district court to challenge the imposition of mandatory meal payments. The record does not disclose that all of the tenants, or even a majority of them, object to the mandatory meals.
The federal appellee is the United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Irma Howard v. Samuel Pierce, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Grand Rapids Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Perry v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Feir v. Carabetta Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Johnson v. Soundview Apartments Housing Development Fund Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Frederick Wuebker and Ruth Wuebker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Curtis v. Housing Authority of the City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Aujero v. Cda Todco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Hanrahan v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.