Legal Opinion

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stanisic

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1969No. 297PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This case involves the type of hearing to which an alien crewman is entitled on his claim that he would suffer persecution upon deportation to his native land. The Court of Appeals sustained the respondent crewman’s contention that he must be heard by a special inquiry officer1 in a proceeding conducted under § 242 (b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.2 Petitioner, the *65Immigration and Naturalization Service, argues that respondent’s claim was properly heard and determined by a district director.3 We brought the case here, 393 U. S. 912 (1968), to resolve the conflict on this score…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leng May Ma v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States Ex Rel. Tomislav Kordic and Venka Kordic v. P. A. Esperdy, as District Director of the Immigration and NaturalizationserviceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Vicko Glavic v. Charles J. Beechie, District DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API