Legal Opinion

Sufficool v. Duncan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1960No. Civ. 6367PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiff-respondents’ complaint sets forth two causes of action against defendant-appellants Tom W. Duncan and his wife. The first cause of action was to quiet title to an easement for road purposes over and along an unnamed road (designated Mesa Road), and the second sought a declaration that said road is a public road. After trial the court found and entered judgment quieting title of plaintiffs to the easement for road purposes appurtenant to their land over the unnamed road and further declared that said road is not now and never has been a public road.

Defendants appeal from paragraph…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Dooling v. DabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Applegate v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Cleary v. TrimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Pipkin v. Der TorosianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API