Conaway v. Toogood
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an action to recover damages claimed by the plaintiffs to have been suffered by them through the acts of the defendants in interfering with their enjoyment and use of an alleged private right of way, and to perpetually enjoin the defendants from so interfering. The case was tried without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs decreeing their right to maintain and use the right of way, eighteen feet in width, as described by metes and bounds, and forever restraining and enjoining the defendants from, obstructing or destroying the said right of way or interfering with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Applegate v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Dooling v. DabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.