Legal Opinion

In Re Rosencrantz

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1928No. Docket No. Crim. 3157PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The petitioner is held in custody by the warden of the state prison at San Quentin under and by virtue of a commitment issued out of the superior court of the county of Alameda. This commitment was issued upon a judgment of conviction of petitioner of the crime of fraudulently making and uttering a check upon a bank without sufficient funds to meet the same, a felony, as defined by section 476a of the Penal Code, after three prior convictions of a felony. The first of said prior convictions was for fraudulently issuing a fictitious check on or about March 8, 1916; the second, for fraudulently…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. People v. OppenheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Herndon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. People v. FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Ex parte GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API