Ricci v. Ricci
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this equity action, exceptions to a decree nisi were dismissed, without considering the merits thereof, because the exceptant failed to file a brief within the time constraints of Montgomery County Rule of Civil Procedure 301(d). On appeal, it is argued that the court erred in denying a request for an extension of time within which to file the exceptant’s brief and that, in any event, the local rule is invalid because it conflicts with the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The complaint in this equity action was filed by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- DeAngelis v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Murphy v. BrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Murphy v. ArmstrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Davison v. John W. Harper, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Dillon by Dillon v. Nat. Rr Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.