Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Armstrong

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1993No. 1702PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether a trial court was authorized to dismiss a complaint with prejudice because the plaintiff violated a local rule by failing to file a brief in response to a defendant’s demurrer. We conclude that a local rule allowing for dismissal for failure to file a brief violates the express dictates of Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 239(f). Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order which dismissed with prejudice the underlying action in this case.

On July 23, 1991, appellants filed their complaint against several defendants,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Speight v. BurensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Taylor v. Oxford Land, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Yeaple v. YeapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Ricci v. RicciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. ANTHONY BIDDLE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Preet Allied American Street, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Wolloch v. AikenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. In Re Adoption of S.P.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. In Re a Conservatorship Proceeding Ex Rel. Germantown Conservancy, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API