Legal Opinion

Rieser v. Glukowsky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1994No. 546PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal we must determine if a court of common pleas has the authority to enter a judgment non pros pursuant to a local rule of civil procedure which contravenes the statewide rules of civil procedure. Because the local rule is inconsistent with the statewide rules, the local rule is invalid, rendering the order entering judgment non pros void. We, therefore, vacate the order entering judgment non pros and the order denying the petition to open the judgment non pros.

Appellant, Robert Rieser, was injured in an automobile accident. Appellee, John Glukowsky, was driving the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennridge Electric, Inc. v. Souderton Area Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Weber v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Barndt v. BarndtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. First Seneca Bank v. Greenville Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Valley Forge Center Associates v. Rib-It/K.P., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Slusaw v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Tohan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API