Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Brong
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1983No. 2592PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, Dennis N. Sakelson, seeks review of two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County entered on September 2, 1981, dismissing both his “Petition for Waiver of Montgomery County Rule 252 and Rule 301(d)” and his exceptions to a verdict entered by the court on June 5, 1980. For the reasons hereinafter expressed, we are constrained to quash this appeal.
Daniel B. Murphy filed a complaint in assumpsit on January 18, 1978, against Mr. and Mrs. George Brong seeking to recover broker’s commissions allegedly due on *342the sale of a business by the Brongs. The Brongs joined Dennis…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Provident National Bank v. RooklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Penstan Supply, Inc. v. HaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Shonberger v. OswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Glosser Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.