Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 27, 1979No. 526PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this appeal we are asked to decide the validity of a local rule of court which authorizes the Prothonotary to enter a judgment of non pros when a plaintiff has failed to answer interrogatories served upon him by a party pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 4005.
The minor plaintiff, Pierre Gonzales, by his guardian, the City of Philadelphia, filed a complaint in trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained when his arm was caught in a conveyor belt on premises of defendant-appellant, Procaccio Brothers Trucking Company. 1 Written interrogatories were filed by Procaccio Brothers and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pompa v. HojnackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smith v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- SOLEBURY NAT. BK., NEW HOPE v. CairnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Hatgimisios v. Dave's N.E. Mint, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Mitchell v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- George H. Althof, Inc. v. Spartan Inns of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Tice v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pride Contracting, Inc. v. Biehn Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.