Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. Hartman

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint in assumpsit after plaintiff’s counsel had neglected to file a brief, as required by Lebanon County Rule 1028, 1 in response to defendants’ preliminary objections. We reverse.

On May 27, 1980, appellant, Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc., filed a complaint in assumpsit against Robin and Linda Hartman, appellees, alleging that appellees had guaranteed the payment of certain advances made by appellant to Harrisburg Harley Davidson, Inc. On June 16, 1980, appellees filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, together…