Legal Opinion

Redington v. Cornwell

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1891No. 13008PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County.. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

—This appeal is from a final judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered on demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint in two counts, and presents for decision the general question, Should the demurrer have been sustained?

The facts alleged in the first count of the complaint are substantially as follows: —

During a period of time embracing all the transactions alleged, the plaintiff and defendant were stock*53holders and directors of the Redington Quicksilver Company, a California corporation, and the plaintiff was president of the board of directors. During the same period the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. President & Trustees v. San Diego & Los Angeles RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kraner v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Granite State Insurance Company, Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Granite State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API