Legal Opinion

Flannery v. Tessaromatis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1949No. 558PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMetcalf, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Portsmouth in favor of the plaintiff, Harold Flannery, against the defendants, George and Harry Tessaro-matis, doing business as Phoenix Pie Company, in an action for damages growing out of a collision between the automobiles driven by plaintiff and a third party.

At about 7:00 o ’clock p. m., on September 12, 1947, plaintiff, together with two passengers, was traveling easterly on Robinson avenue, which avenue runs in a general easterly and westerly direction, and approaching its intersection with Offnere street,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morris v. BloomgreenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Blessing v. WeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Norris v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Connors v. DobbsOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell v. CrookNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API