Legal Opinion

Jones v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1938No. 33,958PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover damages.resulting from a collision of automobiles at an intersection of streets in the city of Wichita. Judgment went for plaintiff and the defendant, W. Cecil McCullough, has appealed. The. defendant, The Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company, need not be considered on this appeal.

Defendant’s principal contentions are: the court erred in overruling his demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, his motion for a directed verdict, in the instructions given, in refusing to give certain requested instructions and in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Keir v. TragerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Robinson v. ShortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Clark v. Southwestern Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Cruse v. DoleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Revell v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API