Morris v. Bloomgreen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Since the cases of Heidle v. Baldwin, 118 Ohio St., 375, 161 N. E., 44, 58 A. L. R., 1186, and George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling, 121 Ohio St., 362, 169 N. E., 292, were reported by this court, our trial and appellate courts have entertained great perplexity in applying the principles therein announced to cases involving collisions at highway intersections; and some of the appellate courts, as did the Court of Appeals in the instant case, while ethically adhering to those decisions, have shown an inclination to question their legal accuracy, in view of the peculiar and express' provisions of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- George Ast Candy Co. v. KlingOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by90 opinions
- Greenfeld v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
- Wolf v. Home Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Vavrina v. GreczanikOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Deming v. OsinskiOhio Supreme Court · 1970
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.