Legal Opinion

Bell v. Crook

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1959No. 34546PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The substance of the petition on which this cause was tried is exhibited by these statements: Appellant was on December 28, 1956, the owner of a Buick sedan automobile which was used in such a manner as to cause the owner of it to be subject to the family purpose doctrine. His son, Thomas William Crook, 18 years of age, lived in the home of his father and operated the automobile at the times important to this litigation with the permission of his father for a purpose for which it was owned by him. The son was a careless and reckless person and a careless and reckless operator of the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. KeoghNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bergendahl v. RabelerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Rowan v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Styskal v. BrickeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Burmeister v. YoungstromSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jarosh v. Van MeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Graves v. BednarNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Nichols v. McArdleNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Schenck v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API