Norris v. Jones

The sole legal question involved herein is whether the evidence of the plaintiff below raised a clear presumption of contributory negligence which was not rebutted by any evidence. A decision of this question necessarily involves a consideration of the testimony introduced by the plaintiff upon the trial.

Throughout the course of this opinion the plaintiff in error will' be called the plaintiff, and the defendant in error, the defendant.

The substance of the plaintiff’s testimony is as follows:

The doctor’s coupe was struck by an interurban car at the intersection of Kiser and Elm streets in the…