Legal Opinion
Excise Board of Love County v. Randolph
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 1935No. 25573PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
S. H. Randolph, sheriff of Love county, files his petition, alleging that he was allowed by law two deputy sheriffs, one of whom was Sam Rhiner; that the excise board of Love county appropriated sufficient money to pay Sam Rhiner’s salary for the months of July' to December, 1933, inclusive, but failed' to appropriate funds with which to pay the salary of Sam Rhiner for the remainder of the fiscal year; that Sam Rhiner’s salary was $100 per month, and that two months’ salary (January and February, 1934) was due. It is further alleged /that f‘it is necessary to keep Sam Rhiner as a deputy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Shawnee v. City of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- State Ex Rel. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Carroll v. State Ex Rel. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Fulton v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Reisinger v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. BoyettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Goeppinger v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. White Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957