Carroll v. State Ex Rel. Mosier
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Osage County; Preston A. Shinn, Judge. Action toy the State, on relation of W. T. Mosier and others, for writ of mandamus to R. L. Carroll, J.' M. Buckley, H. M. Loomer, Commissioners of the City of Pawhuska, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defefid-ants bring error.
1Per curiam
This is an action for mandamus brought by defendants in error in the district court of Osage county against the commissioners of the city of Pawhuska •and others, to compel them to certify certain amendments voted upon at the election held in the city of Pawhuska on the 6th day of April, 1920, together with a record of the proceedings submitting the same, with the returns of the county election hoard, to the Governor.
Article 10, sec. 1, of the charter of the city of Pawhuska provides:
“Article 10. Amendments, Repeals. Section 1: Amendments. Whenever a petition containing a proposed amendment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. SteersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Jones v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Thornburgh v. Ben Hur Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Hoskins v. PeakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- State ex rel. Murray v. BeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.