Legal Opinion

Reisinger v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1933No. 24078PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, ,T.

This is an original action in mandamus wherein the petitioner asks this court to direct the Honorable Thurman S. Hurst, as district judge, to vacate an order granting a new trial, to render a judgment, and to adjust the costs in a certain action entitled “E. E. Reisinger v. Van Huss & Van Huss,” No. 32297, in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla. An appeal was taken from the judgment of that court in that cause and the judgment of that court was affirmed in part and reversed in part by the decision of this court. Reisinger v. Van Huss, 356 Okla. 8, 9 P. (2d) 724.

After the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reisinger v. Van HussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tulsa Tribune Co. v. Oklahoma Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Board of Education of Duncan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Westbrook v. Oklahoma Public Welfare Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Crawford v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Excise Board of Love County v. RandolphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API