Legal Opinion

Goeppinger v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 1962No. 39942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The present proceeding was instituted below by the plaintiff in error, a judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County, who sought to compel, by a writ of mandamus, the payment of his claims for an additional salary asserted to be due him from the Court Fund (of Tulsa County). The parties defendant, joined in their respective ex officio capacities as depositary, administrator and members of the governing board of the Court Fund, were these officials: the county treasurer, court clerk, county judge, county attorney and the district judges (of the District Court of Tulsa County), all of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Coal County v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Levine v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Morrison v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Excise Board of Love County v. RandolphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melton v. City of DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Fears v. Cattlemen's Investment CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Lee v. MylesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API