Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 31, 1934No. 25691PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The plaintiff seeks by mandamus to compel the defendant, the Corporation Commission of the state, to grant plaintiff a trial and hearing on the application of plaintiff heretofore presented to the Commission for an adjustment of the determined capacity of certain oil wells to produce oil, or an adjustment of the potential production of oil from said wells.
The oil wells in question are in the Oklahoma City field, and are owned and operated by the plaintiff and produce oil from the supply or reservoir defined or designated as the Wilcox sand or Wilcox zone.
The Commission has authority to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Sterling Refining Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Westbrook v. Oklahoma Public Welfare Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- State ex rel. Smith v. Banking BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.