Legal Opinion

Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. v. Orlin Ladwig, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1985No. C1-85-155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. and Floyd Lad-wig (plaintiffs/appellants) appeal the trial court’s ruling that neither Orlin Ladwig, Inc. nor Orlin Ladwig individually (defend ants/respondents) owe them any money, since the defendant corporation paid its full obligation to plaintiffs under the corporate “spin-off” agreement. We affirm.

FACTS

For some years prior to 1980, Floyd Lad-wig and Orlin Ladwig farmed in Stearns County under the name Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. Each owned 159 shares of the corporation and their wives each owned one share, for a total of 320 shares.

The corporation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. C. H. Young Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. King v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Norris v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n by the City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Anderson v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API