Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. v. Orlin Ladwig, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. and Floyd Lad-wig (plaintiffs/appellants) appeal the trial court’s ruling that neither Orlin Ladwig, Inc. nor Orlin Ladwig individually (defend ants/respondents) owe them any money, since the defendant corporation paid its full obligation to plaintiffs under the corporate “spin-off” agreement. We affirm.
FACTS
For some years prior to 1980, Floyd Lad-wig and Orlin Ladwig farmed in Stearns County under the name Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. Each owned 159 shares of the corporation and their wives each owned one share, for a total of 320 shares.
The corporation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- C. H. Young Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- King v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Norris v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- In Re Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n by the City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Anderson v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988