Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Honeywell, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1988No. C9-87-2370Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Acting Judge.
Relator seeks review of the Commissioner’s decision reversing the referee’s finding that respondent Anderson was discharged for misconduct. We affirm the Commissioner’s decision.
FACTS
Respondent Anderson worked full-time for relator Honeywell from November 17, 1977 to July 9, 1987. Anderson was given time off from January 20 to January 23, 1987, and from February 4 to March 23, 1987 because she sustained a work-related injury. She collected workers’ compensation temporary total disability benefits during her absence.
Anderson also worked part-time for Twin…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.