Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n by the City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1988No. C4-88-1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Relator Peoples Cooperative Power Association filed a complaint against respondent City of Rochester, which operates Rochester Public Utilities. Peoples seeks to (a) prevent Rochester from providing utility service to customers in territory recently annexed by the city, (b) require Rochester to pay to acquire the service area from Peoples, and (c) obtain authorization to provide interim service in the area until the question of compensation is determined.
Respondent Public Utilities Commission determined that a contested case hearing is appropriate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLISSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- In Re the Placement on Unrequested Leave of Absence of PinkneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. v. Orlin Ladwig, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re Estate of GelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Peterson v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Intra-Lata Equal AccessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re the Application by the City of Rochester for an Adjustment of Its Service Area Boundaries With Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- In re the Proposed Termination of VolzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989