Legal Opinion
ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1985No. C6-84-1596PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Acton Construction Company appeals from a judgment that accord and satisfaction bars recovery of its claim for additional compensation incurred on the construction of a bridge and related highway work. Acton contends that the evidence does not support the trial court’s determination that an accord and satisfaction resulted when it signed a Department of Transportation certificate of final acceptance and negotiated a check in the amount set forth in the certificate. The State contends that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding of an accord and satisfaction. If…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. SallbladSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3Cited by9 opinions
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Acton Construction Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Ahrens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.